'to hit' chart the same as the 'to wound* chart?

Sureal · Post by **Sureal** » Thu Nov 14, 2002 8:15 pm

Just wondering what you all think (by the way - I voted 'yes' as it would make the elven WS much better).

Binky · Post by **Binky** » Thu Nov 14, 2002 8:33 pm

D & B has spoken

Sureal · Post by **Sureal** » Thu Nov 14, 2002 8:36 pm

What a surprise you chose that

.
Lets see if anyone else can guess what you chose

.

Binky · Post by **Binky** » Thu Nov 14, 2002 8:39 pm

Well actually yeah it should be, but I don't want it to be 'coz my troopers are WS 2 :oops:

Sureal · Post by **Sureal** » Thu Nov 14, 2002 8:41 pm

Lol - give your oponents a chance to actually beat you once in a while

.

Binky · Post by **Binky** » Thu Nov 14, 2002 8:52 pm

But that would take all the fun out of ruthlessly CRUSHING my opponents with an army which outnumbers them 2-1 (Gotta love the invocation)... In my last 6 games I've ended up with more points worth of models on the table than I started with...

Sureal · Post by **Sureal** » Thu Nov 14, 2002 8:55 pm

My point exactly

.

And it would help me to Crush! my oponents :twisted:

.

Post by **Dark Alliance** » Fri Nov 15, 2002 12:53 am

Orange crush???

Dungeon_god · Post by **Dungeon_god** » Fri Nov 15, 2002 2:27 pm

Dark Alliance wrote:Orange crush???

CRUSH

You Mean like That?

Sureal · Post by **Sureal** » Fri Nov 15, 2002 5:07 pm

Mmmm - pears.

Leithel and odd · Post by **Leithel and odd** » Sat Nov 16, 2002 1:48 am

Ewwww pears! mmm Bananas.

I don't think they should be the same but I do think there should be more likely hood of missing when you've got WS2 VS WS9 or more chance of hitting in reverse.

Dungeon_god · Post by **Dungeon_god** » Sat Nov 16, 2002 6:16 am

Yes, I agree.

Post by **Imdat tauble** » Sat Nov 16, 2002 9:16 am

yep there needs to be a 2+ to hit and a 6+ to hit somewhere in there...

Leithel and odd · Post by **Leithel and odd** » Sun Nov 17, 2002 10:09 am

Perhaps 10 VS 1 and/or 1 VS 10 could be the extremity of the 6+ and 2+ and work in with an extrapolated version of the wound chart.

Arickrol · Post by **Arickrol** » Mon Nov 18, 2002 7:16 pm

C'mon, they should be the same for the sheer sake of simplicity. If they are the same then it is one less thing to memorize and that means the time spent memorizing them can now be spent on painting, or assembling, or working to get the money with which to buy the things to paint and assemble.

'to hit' chart the same as the 'to wound* chart?

Should the 'to hit' chart be the same as the 'to wound* chart?

'to hit' chart the same as the 'to wound* chart?