Girls are EVIL, as shown by Maths

Heptzul · Post by **Heptzul** » Sat Oct 14, 2006 8:26 am

First post here so, Hi.

Right, so:

Girls are Time and Money -
Girls = Time x Money

Time is Money -
Time = Money

Thus:
Girls = Money squared

Now, we all know that money is the root of all evil -
Money = Root(Evil)

Substitute "Money" for "Root(Evil)" in the "Girls = Money Squared" equasion and we get ...
Girls = Root(Evil)squared or Girls = EVIL!

Cenyu · Post by **Cenyu** » Sat Oct 14, 2006 8:41 am

This is so.... 1991.

Eldacar · Post by **Eldacar** » Sat Oct 14, 2006 9:35 am

Old. So very, very old. Still, I don't doubt that somebody will probably find it funny since they'll never have seen it before.

Ilokir lúinwë · Post by **Ilokir lúinwë** » Sat Oct 14, 2006 9:40 am

Eldacar wrote:Old. So very, very old

True, but so very true, very true

Hulkster · Post by **Hulkster** » Sat Oct 14, 2006 10:45 am

Is it me or is it getting cOLD in here

though it is funny if you havent heard it before

Thisisntnotjt · Post by **Thisisntnotjt** » Sat Oct 14, 2006 2:13 pm

Yes, well, Hi! welcome to dnet!

Eeeeron · Post by **Eeeeron** » Fri Oct 20, 2006 12:51 pm

You can prove pretty much anything with maths for example 2=1.

Belial · Post by **Belial** » Fri Oct 20, 2006 1:12 pm

AFAIK the very famous equation is actually not true... I cant give you a demonstration, as I am no math genius my self, but I think it was on this very site I saw someone pointing out a mistake in the 2=1 equation...

R4v3n · Post by **R4v3n** » Fri Oct 20, 2006 1:46 pm

the only way you can make 2=1 is when you divide my 0.

so get out a calculator, and type 5 divided zero. you should get something called an error or error 2.

Belial · Post by **Belial** » Fri Oct 20, 2006 1:52 pm

Oh yes, something like that. It is not possible to divide by 0. Thus is the rules of math.

Dargor · Post by **Dargor** » Fri Oct 20, 2006 2:22 pm

As R4V3N correctly pointed out, the problem of equations proving that 2=1 invariably involves dividing by zero. In ordinary (real-number) arithmetic, such an expression has no meaning.

However, a somewhat similar invalid proof that fascinates me is the one that proves that ∞ = 1/4. The funny thing with this type of invalid proof is that it can be "checked," unlike the ones that rely on division by zero.

Proof that ∞ = 1/4

Since an infinitely large plane has the coordinates of (-∞,∞) × (-∞,∞), this means that

∞ = [∞ - (-∞)]²

Which can be simplified to

∞ = (2∞)²

The rest follows naturally:

∞ = 4∞²

∞/∞² = 4

1/∞ = 4

1 = 4∞

∞ = 1/4

This proof's fallacy is using ∞ (infinity) to represent a finite value – in reality infinity is thought of as a direction as opposed to a destination.

PS: The girls = evil proof is only funny if you've heard the expression "girls equal time times money". The way you present it, it should be girls = time + money or girls = time AND money, none of which would give you the desired result.

Tacklbry · Post by **Tacklbry** » Fri Oct 20, 2006 2:29 pm

Evil is as Evil does Forest Gump.

Getwisteerd · Post by **Getwisteerd** » Fri Oct 20, 2006 3:49 pm

Since an infinitely large plane has the coordinates of (-∞,∞) × (-∞,∞), this means that

∞ = [∞ - (-∞)]²

???

unless I'm very mistaken it should be (-∞,∞)², and as a ',' isn't the same as 'x' this can't be simplified any further

So, am I doing something wrong or are you?

Dargor · Post by **Dargor** » Fri Oct 20, 2006 5:10 pm

(-∞,∞)² = (-∞,∞) × (-∞,∞), no?

Belial · Post by **Belial** » Fri Oct 20, 2006 5:45 pm

Yes, that is correct.

Duc de buc · Post by **Duc de buc** » Fri Oct 20, 2006 6:06 pm

Dargor wrote:
Proof that ∞ = 1/4

Since an infinitely large plane has the coordinates of (-∞,∞) × (-∞,∞), this means that

∞ = [∞ - (-∞)]²

Which can be simplified to

∞ = (2∞)²

The rest follows naturally:

∞ = 4∞²

∞/∞² = 4

1/∞ = 4

1 = 4∞

∞ = 1/4

This proof's fallacy is using ∞ (infinity) to represent a finite value – in reality infinity is thought of as a direction as opposed to a destination.

The problem is that 1/∞ = 0 and can't be 4.
Another problem is that ∞/∞ = ∞, because ∞ has no definition.

Why it has no definition? Because the mathematicians need an area were they can postulate problems which you can't proof: In the infinity, everything is possible...^^

Was it comprehensible?

Kezef · Post by **Kezef** » Fri Oct 20, 2006 6:37 pm

Never tell this joke to a Woman. She'll do nasty things because in effect, your calling all Women prostitutes.

Rasputinii · Post by **Rasputinii** » Fri Oct 20, 2006 7:12 pm

I prefer the boobies joke on the upside calculator. Yet I have never been able to master the secrets to that one. Jus have to wait to find a similarly childish person to do it for me...

Post by **Daeron** » Fri Oct 20, 2006 8:21 pm

Duc de Buc wrote:
Dargor wrote:
Proof that ? = 1/4

Since an infinitely large plane has the coordinates of (-?,?) × (-?,?), this means that

? = [? - (-?)]²

Which can be simplified to

? = (2?)²

The rest follows naturally:

? = 4?²

?/?² = 4

1/? = 4

1 = 4?

? = 1/4

This proof's fallacy is using ? (infinity) to represent a finite value – in reality infinity is thought of as a direction as opposed to a destination.

The problem is that 1/? = 0 and can't be 4.
Another problem is that ?/? = ?, because ? has no definition.

Why it has no definition? Because the mathematicians need an area were they can postulate problems which you can't proof: In the infinity, everything is possible...^^

Was it comprehensible?

Even then... ?/? is undefined. so is ?/?². Anyways, don't bother with it fellas. Every mathematician trying to figure out infinity turned crazy!

Holt · Post by **Holt** » Fri Oct 20, 2006 9:02 pm

I prefer the boobies joke on the upside calculator. Yet I have never been able to master the secrets to that one. Jus have to wait to find a similarly childish person to do it for me...
_________________

Not really a boobies one but theres a little story that goes a bit like ths....

A 13 year old girl has 84 boobs and wants 45 so the doctor gives her 2 pills but she takes 4 and ends up...
Type 1384452 in to your calculator as you get to the numbers in the story and when you get to "but she takes 4" multiply 1384452 by 4 and turn your calculator upsidedown to find how she ends up.

Getwisteerd · Post by **Getwisteerd** » Fri Oct 20, 2006 11:11 pm

Daeron wrote:Even then... ?/? is undefined. so is ?/?². Anyways, don't bother with it fellas. Every mathematician trying to figure out infinity turned crazy!

don't worry, I'm already crazy

Fr0 · Post by **Fr0** » Sat Oct 21, 2006 3:50 am

Dargor is still alive!

Nice to see you're good at math. I don't understand anything you posted in terms of those formulas.

Fr0

Dargor · Post by **Dargor** » Sat Oct 21, 2006 4:06 pm

Daeron wrote:Even then... ?/? is undefined. so is ?/?². Anyways, don't bother with it fellas. Every mathematician trying to figure out infinity turned crazy!

That's exactly why it's not a correct proof. I'm treating ∞ as any other value and not the concept of infinity. If infinity hadn't been infinity, ∞/∞ would be 1 and provided that the area of an infinite large plane is (-∞,∞)², ∞/∞² would be 4. Of course, this isn't correct; infinity is probably a lot greater 1/4 and can't at any rate be given a proper value - it's infinite.

Fr0 wrote:Dargor is still alive! :D

Alive and kicking.

Heptzul · Post by **Heptzul** » Sat Oct 21, 2006 10:27 pm

A + B to the n over n = X .... hence God exists; reply.

Think it through.

R4v3n · Post by **R4v3n** » Sun Oct 22, 2006 1:25 am

your all crazy.