Logo
View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Mon Dec 18, 2017 1:22 am



Reply to topic  [ 35 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Is it better to be a good general, or a lucky general? 

Better to be good or lucky?
Good 58%  58%  [ 28 ]
Lucky 42%  42%  [ 20 ]
Total votes : 48

Is it better to be a good general, or a lucky general? 
Author Message
Dark Rider
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2004 12:43 am
Posts: 128
There are two ways to win...which do you think is better?


Wed Nov 05, 2008 6:27 am
Profile
Angel of Darkness
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 11, 2007 6:06 am
Posts: 3455
Location: Australia
Post 
I think a bit of both. While good maneuvering and clever tactics can win you a game, without a bit of luck, you'll never win a game at all.

While luck is needed for all the rolls you need to perform in warhammer, good maneuvering, tactics etc; can cover you and so less luck is needed.

_________________
Saldrimek Xenan - WS6 / S4 / T3 / D5 / I3

Equipment: Executioners Axe (Rune of Beastslaying - Heroic Killing Blow), 2 Scimitars (Rune of Speed - Always Strike First), Dagger, Rune Branded Leather Armour, Executioner Helm, Fine Set of Throwing Knives (x4)
Inventory: Amulet of Darkness, Poison Vials x7, Deadly Poison Vials x8
Mount: Dark Steed
Gold: 163
Skills: Ambidexterity, Frenzy, Two Weapon Fighting, Ride
Class: Khainite


Wed Nov 05, 2008 6:42 am
Profile
Dark Illusionist
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 7:25 am
Posts: 2270
Location: Dating a Witch elf...
Post 
Basically I agree with Khel, but I tend towards saying that being a good general is a little more important than being a lucky one. This is because you can always rely on being a good general (unless you're hungover and tired and have a blackout... but then chances are you won't be playing warhammer anyway). You can never rely in being lucky, on the other hand and as Khel said - to an extent you can make up for bad luck with your skill (otherwise you may as well play poker wearing masks... that'd be about the same).

On the other hand, you can always be caught off guard by bad luck, no matter how good a general you are. I remember how I beat the tactically most skilled DE player in my store because his anointed didn't kill a single one of my cold one knights, broke and allowed my five knights to charge his unit of ten cold one knights and wipe them out...

HUZZAH!

_________________
When I think of something witty, I shall put it here.


Wed Nov 05, 2008 6:56 am
Profile
Assassin
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2004 9:43 am
Posts: 563
Location: Den Haag
Post 
Mr. Anderson wrote:
(unless you're hungover and tired and have a blackout... but then chances are you won't be playing warhammer anyway).


I guess you have never been to the second day of a GT?
Sometimes it's even nice to notice the freshness of the bit of air surrounding you :P

On topic: a good general is better to be in the long run, as the lucky player will even out anyway

_________________
Never know what to do next, you might surprise yourself


Wed Nov 05, 2008 7:59 am
Profile
Corsair

Joined: Thu Oct 02, 2008 11:35 am
Posts: 84
Post 
Tricky question. There's no such thing as luck, but I don't approve of calling people 'good generals.' :)

Still, the best you can do is play well and hope the dice don't mess things up. It's a very random game, and there's nothing to be done about that.

_________________
your western homes are locked forever


Wed Nov 05, 2008 9:34 am
Profile
Cold One Knight
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 15, 2004 12:28 am
Posts: 248
Post 
Well there is that famous quote by Napoleon Bonaparte about lucky generals :D

Both ideally. Being good is more rewarding but being lucky often tips things


Wed Nov 05, 2008 10:09 am
Profile
Malekith's Personal Guard
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 03, 2004 10:46 am
Posts: 840
Location: Testing the new jacuzZi with Morathi
Post 
A good general is able to reduce the luck into a little corner. It's still there, but for a minimal part and when jinx hits, only sometimes it can change the wave of the battle.

Then it's better to be known as a brilliant but unlucky tactician than a blessed by luck with no skills.

_________________
Master of Arneim, proud ruler of the cult of the thousand draichs, because bigger is better.


Wed Nov 05, 2008 10:21 am
Profile
Trainee Warrior
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2008 9:09 am
Posts: 37
Post 
you can lose with a good tactic but you'll never win with a bad one.

luck is needed for sure, but being skilled is more importent.

_________________
you can lose with a good tactic but you'll never win with a bad one.

My Brute will beat yours!


Wed Nov 05, 2008 10:33 am
Profile
Shadowdancer
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 1:16 pm
Posts: 4987
Location: The deepest pits in a hell of my own making
Post 
I've had games where every dice roll I made resulted in below average results and my opponant rolled normally to well. In all cases I've managed to swing a draw thanks to knowing how to use the units I had chosen. If I'd have some good luck instead of basic know-how I would probably have won those battles by a significant margin.

_________________
ImageImageImageImage
faerthurir wrote:
Arq kicked me in the gyros.


Wed Nov 05, 2008 4:52 pm
Profile YIM WWW
Shade
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 3:09 pm
Posts: 106
Location: in a galxy far far away
Post 
You can beat a good player but you can't beat a lucky one. :(

_________________
(\__/)
(O.o )
(> < ) This is Bunny. Copy and paste Bunny into your signature to help him gain world domination.

3/4 of games are won by deathstars. Copy this into your signature if you still use real tactics to win.


Wed Nov 05, 2008 5:24 pm
Profile
Malekith's Personal Guard
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2008 7:22 pm
Posts: 924
Location: Rallying Team Druchii.net
Post 
same as khel really but i voted for luck - because as has been said before if your dice shaft you then you lose the game - regardless of how well you play.

So luck gets the vote - but id probably prefer to be a good player than a lucky one

_________________
Name: Khalia D'Vaarko (meaning: Khalia, property of Vaarko)
Age: 210
Height/Weight: 5'6", 8 stone
Other: no distinguishing features, barring the brand of a great house left wrist.
Class: Mage
Equipment: Robes, Dagger, Staff
Skills: Power of Ulgu, Power of Chamon
Stats: Ws3, S3, T3, D4, I5

lrnec wrote:
Reality and truth is more brutal than almost any fantasy game


Wed Nov 05, 2008 5:35 pm
Profile
Warrior
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2007 5:24 pm
Posts: 65
Location: Testing the new RXBow at the shooting Range.
Post 
A lucky general can become a good general but a good general not a lucky one otherwise he would be allready a lucky general. ;)

_________________
- Its not allowed to feed your Cold One with more than three High Elfes per day, (remember all the itzy bitzy things on their clothes, hair, and skin) to avoid sickness of your Cold One.
- Druchii Cold One Field Manual Chapter 3, Page 73.


Wed Nov 05, 2008 6:28 pm
Profile
Rumour Lord of Doom
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 22, 2003 5:11 pm
Posts: 3483
Location: Har Ganeth (Santa Cruz, CA
Post 
"Luck is the residue of design"

I believe luck matters to an extent but for the most part great generalship > luck.

-Rex

_________________
Moderator - Druchii Tactics
Belial. wrote:
OT [forum] is quite quiet most of the time, except when Azure makes a new topic.

Free Porn!
Become my padawan! This game is fun! http://azuredruchii.mybrute.com


Wed Nov 05, 2008 8:12 pm
Profile YIM WWW
Executioner
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 06, 2008 10:33 am
Posts: 195
Post 
Personally I belive to an extent you can make your own luck with good judgement calls and tatics

a few examples Ive used might be,

CoK or CoC need to charge next turn a unit maybe locked in combat, either you place it ready to charge or you place it 3 " away to charge, next turn you can rely on luck if you call it that you dont fail that stupid test or you roll and pass or fail you hit your target.

witch elfs look to charge chaos warriors, with luck a front of 5 with F/C will push 16 poisoned attacks and warriors will fail saves you could and way well win combat. if luck is not on your side you got a pile of dead witch elfs.

other option might be line up the charge in the flank with CoK you are looking at a much better chance of not only breaking the unit but not having any attacks back at you due to the 'chances'

another example has happened to me,

I have a block of Longbeards at 20 strong static res of 6. front charge by 9 brets, after all thier high strenght attacks they still lose combat and break an unlucky general? or a lucky dwarf player? yet the same block of dwarfs is hit in the flank by 2 charriots and 1 in the front (coldone carriots) im looking at snake eyes or flee due to fear, lucky or good general?

What in trying to say is at times lady luck will smile and at times she frowns but if due to tatics and good generalship you make her smile when she can frown lady luck has little say.

ever rolled killing blow on those war machine crews from your executioners? did you need KB? no but lady luck said you got it..

hope you see where im coming from.


Wed Nov 05, 2008 8:42 pm
Profile
Malekith's Best Friend
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2007 8:31 pm
Posts: 3023
Location: The Tower of Dust
Post 
Read Sig

_________________
"Luck is the residue of design"


Wed Nov 05, 2008 8:45 pm
Profile
Highborn
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jun 26, 2004 9:20 am
Posts: 609
Location: Here Obviously
Post 
Im afraid no matter how skilful you are, those 1's and 6's can always appear at the wrong times. And without luck they be appearing too often.

"ok so my COC fails to kill anything and you destroy it in return?"

_________________
...Well thats the end of my post


Wed Nov 05, 2008 8:57 pm
Profile
Cold One Knight

Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2008 6:48 pm
Posts: 213
Post 
In sports, to win a championship you have to be lucky and good.

so can I vote for both...?


Thu Nov 06, 2008 12:19 am
Profile
Trademaster
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 25, 2005 7:32 pm
Posts: 3170
Location: Ontario, Canada
Post 
Being better means you're more consistent, which is better than being lucky overall. Though if you're lucky enought to pass every test in the game, then you'll always win so it becomes a matter of your definition of better.

_________________
Trading Forum


Thu Nov 06, 2008 2:41 am
Profile ICQ WWW
Executioner
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 06, 2008 10:33 am
Posts: 195
Post 
Gibious wrote:
Im afraid no matter how skilful you are, those 1's and 6's can always appear at the wrong times. And without luck they be appearing too often.

"ok so my COC fails to kill anything and you destroy it in return?"


I agree 1 over 6's is not good.

If you need a 6 to do the job send in 3 charriots and you have your 6 on a bad roll.

to send in 3 charriots will take a a good general to possition his army in a way to set the trap a lucky general might stumble across that possition.


Thu Nov 06, 2008 10:26 am
Profile
Assassin
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2008 9:33 pm
Posts: 576
Location: Baking in the hot Summer sun
Post 
Fortes fortuna adiuvat?

Hey, I say, if you have bad luck, you can blame your losses on luck. If you have bad skills, you have no one to blame but yourself.

Besides, luck is much more flashy.


Thu Nov 06, 2008 4:18 pm
Profile
Black Guard
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2006 2:47 pm
Posts: 270
Post 
For me - being good general over lucky definitly. I play warhammer for satisfaction of winning, but also - or even more - pleasure of the game itself. Massacred my buddy's WE last week, but don't feel like it was a good game - not that any of us played unfair; simply 90% of the outcome came from my great luck and his bad luck. It was very frustrating for him and unsatidfcationary for me, as none of us felt that this outcome had anything to do with our skills.

So a good game for me is where luck is more or less evened out. And then I would still have more satisfaction in winning if I had odds a bit against me.


Thu Nov 06, 2008 11:37 pm
Profile
Highborn
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 10, 2002 9:36 pm
Posts: 674
Post 
I would rather be lucky every day of the week!

If my dice are hot I am going to win no matter how bad of decisions I make.

That being said that kind of luck usually never happens so its better off having some skill and knowing the rules.

_________________
Anyone else find it kinda interesting that DE will not use gun powder because its unreliable but seem to have no problem using cold ones?


Fri Nov 07, 2008 12:19 am
Profile
Malekith's Best Friend
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2008 3:40 am
Posts: 1004
Post 
- A good general can win even when he is unlucky,
-If you rely on luck you will probably find you win 50% of your games.
No One can be 'lucky' as it always evens out in the long run.

_________________
"I will embrace death without regret as I embrace life without fear"
ImageImageImage


Fri Nov 07, 2008 1:44 am
Profile
Highborn
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 10, 2007 10:08 am
Posts: 655
Location: The land of Oz
Post 
Skill can be gained, luck can't so I'd rather start out lucky.

_________________
"I have this magic sword, it kills people when you stick it in them"


Fri Nov 07, 2008 7:30 am
Profile WWW
Executioner
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 06, 2008 10:33 am
Posts: 195
Post 
some one said something to me when we was talking about Probability

Adversity reveals your Genius while Good fortune conceals your incompotence


Fri Nov 07, 2008 12:18 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 35 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Designed by ST Software