Well in the new WD there are new rules for regen - why I dont know - but I think its pure crap.
Basically, it allows you to negate all wounds except 3, then you can dispel these with a roll of 4+ on 3 dice....
Anyone think this is going to completely ruin the game? I mean it makes trolls one hell of a unit, and characters even stronger...
GW must want to sell more 20$ chaos trolls
New Regeneration Rules...
Moderator: The Dread Knights
New Regeneration Rules...
Death to Malekith!
Um, if you 'kill' trolls by let's say 5 stone trolls recieve 7 wounds in CC, then you roll 7 dices, and let's say that you succed with all xept 2, that would be...
Casualties;
2 Trolls and 1 Troll with 2 Wounds remaining.
End results;
(1+3+1=5) 4 Trolls with full wounds and 1 troll with 1 wound remaining.
If you ppl would have thought otherwise then you must have played with one hell of crappy Trolls, especially with their I1...
The reason why the logical fire method isnt held is because it is to good otherwise, therefore the fire effect remains, despite the logic...
Casualties;
2 Trolls and 1 Troll with 2 Wounds remaining.
End results;
(1+3+1=5) 4 Trolls with full wounds and 1 troll with 1 wound remaining.
If you ppl would have thought otherwise then you must have played with one hell of crappy Trolls, especially with their I1...
The reason why the logical fire method isnt held is because it is to good otherwise, therefore the fire effect remains, despite the logic...
Jal'Koreth ultrin!
so if you kill 2 trolls, they still can regenerate the maximum they lost, hence 3 dice for the two of them and 1 for the one who lost 1 wound (3+3+1=7), so what I said was true.
If the new rules are as you say, then that is in an effort to make things more realistic (by a character chopped to bits takes to long of time to be able to regenerate himself to be able to participate in the remaining battle..), altough they get more crappy than before, still the times when ones character which has regenerate suffer 3 or more wounds is few, so it wont be that noticable...
By my guess thats what the GW team might have thought
If the new rules are as you say, then that is in an effort to make things more realistic (by a character chopped to bits takes to long of time to be able to regenerate himself to be able to participate in the remaining battle..), altough they get more crappy than before, still the times when ones character which has regenerate suffer 3 or more wounds is few, so it wont be that noticable...
By my guess thats what the GW team might have thought
Jal'Koreth ultrin!
- Leithel and odd
- My own worst enemy
- Posts: 2453
- Joined: Mon Aug 05, 2002 4:58 am
- Location: Sydney, Australia
- Contact:
Which WD number are these rules in? I'm not sure if it's in the one we have out here at the moment or next months for us.
Then, upon the velvet sinking, I betook myself to linking
Fancy unto fancy, thinking what this ominous bird of yore --
What this grim, ungainly, ghastly, gaunt and ominous bird of yore
Meant in croaking "Nevermore."
E. A. Poe
Fancy unto fancy, thinking what this ominous bird of yore --
What this grim, ungainly, ghastly, gaunt and ominous bird of yore
Meant in croaking "Nevermore."
E. A. Poe
-
- Noble
- Posts: 496
- Joined: Sat Aug 10, 2002 1:18 pm
- Location: Gone with the wind