Sorry but you're wrong. There is really no other way to say you are wrong, than that. (I don't care that you're from Italy or wherever either).
Nice...
I didn't say that I'm from Italy to state that I know the rules and you don't. I have already saw this move many and many times.
Under wheeling it doesn't state anything about models moving more than their move distance.
Is a wheeling a movement? Yes. What is said about movements? That no models can move more than their move rate.
It simply states "all models in the unit count as moving as far as the outside model". The outside model is the front one as shown in the diagram 13.1. In fact if you start to move even a regular sized, but more rectangularly shaped unit in a wheel you will see that some of the back models indeed move farther than allotted. There is no mention of rectangularly shaped units under wheeling.
There is no word either that you've to measure from the first rank. If you look at the diagrams as like the written rules, then it would mean that those rules could be applied only to orcs and empire armies. Diagrams do not show all and leave more doubts than the ones they solve.
Moreover, for example, models in units that reform may move up to twice their movement rate.
And this is clearly stated by the rulebook, so no problems of any kind arise here.
What I have mentioned is a problem with movement in warhammer that has been around for a very long time and is known to many older gamers. Most people control the urge to pull off such unrealistic maneuvers simply to protect the game from silliness. Indeed a VC army could be rediculously annoying if people made long congo lines out of their units.
You are absolutely right. But what has to be told is that many and many and many and many times we see behaviours and (in the practice) actions that leaves some doubts only because we do not read properly the rulebook. I'm not saying that if there is nothing written we have to look at the "way the game is designed for" or counting on the "fair and correct playing" or so on.
I could give you another example: extending the frontage. Happened in the Uk Heat (the first) that someone thought to extend the frontage only on one side, then reducing it with the purpose to gain a lateral movement longer than what he could get with the "turn, move, turn" . In the 7th edition there is no more the rule that you've to keep your centre blocked or you've to bring to the left as many models as to the right. Here's a little scheme:
xxxxx
xxxxx
xxxxxxxxxx
------xxxxx
------xxxxx
Nobody said nothing (excluding the poor opponent :-)) because the referee considered (after a while) this a legal move. What was wrong was that the models could not do this movement because they bypassed their move rate, being even the extension of the frontage subject to the rules about moving. The limit is the same as for your manouver.