implies that the witch would still count the WE
Erm, yeah, should one witch lose frenzy she will be able to count other witches as friendly, note the phrase:
for a warrior of the other sect
It makes perfect sense to me.
Moderators: Loflar, The Dread Knights
Arquinsiel wrote:implies that the witch would still count the WE
Erm, yeah, should one witch lose frenzy she will be able to count other witches as friendly, note the phrase:
General Kala wrote:All my eloquence fails to express it as well as this.Cenyu wrote:Hail to the King, baby.
A neutral shade of black. wrote:Typo on account of fatigue (sorceress = sorcière = witch).
General Kala wrote:All my eloquence fails to express it as well as this.Cenyu wrote:Hail to the King, baby.
Oui, sauf qu'une furie an anglais, c'est une gargouille du Chaos. Vive GeuWeu et leur département traductions, hein?
Sect Enimity:
Witch elves and Sorceress do not count as a friendly model for the purposes of an All Alone test for a warrior of the other sect. Note that for a witch elf this will only apply should she lose her frenzy.
faerthurir wrote:Arq kicked me in the gyros.
Arquinsiel wrote:Anyway, to sort it all out:
Sect Enimity:
Witch elves and Sorceress do not count as a friendly model for the purposes of an All Alone test for a warrior of the other sect. Note that for a witch elf this will only apply should she lose her frenzy.
Better?
General Kala wrote:All my eloquence fails to express it as well as this.Cenyu wrote:Hail to the King, baby.