 |
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 14 posts ] |
|
Author |
Message |
Dalamar
Dragon Lord
Joined: Sat Sep 21, 2002 6:42 pm Posts: 9671 Location: Designing new breeds of Dragons
|
If you're enjoying AoS, great for you.
Now try to play at least semi-competitively, face Screaming Bell and Kairos or a single scarab swarm and insta lose with no chance to win.
_________________ 7th edition army book: Games Played: 213 Games Won: 114 (54%) Games Drawn: 33 (15%) Games Lost: 66 (31%)
8th Edition army book W/D/L: Druchii: 36/4/16
|
Mon Jul 13, 2015 1:35 am |
|
 |
The Mattler
Slave (off the Altar)
Joined: Sun Jun 22, 2014 6:21 am Posts: 13
|
1) It's a permissive rule set, so you cannot pick a number other than those provided by the dice. The possible results of a D6 are 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, or 6; Kairos does not have the ability to set the dice roll to any other number. In the Oracle of Eternity rule, if you replace "result" with "top face" you'll see how the grammar supports that interpretation. It doesn't say "a" or "any" result; the definite article indicates that the result must be drawn from the set of possible results. It's annoying that GW likes to use "dice" for both the singular and the plural, but the same logic applies regardless of the number of dice and how broadly you want to interpret the word "roll". 2) Deploying a single Tomb Swarm hidden and selecting Endure for Sudden Death, results in immediate loss because you have no models on the table. Mod's edit: These first two posts were off topic in "Recognition to Rick Priestley". Still, the content has its interest and deserves a thread of its own. Let's discuss it in another thread, with appropriate title. Thanks, Calisson
|
Mon Jul 13, 2015 7:29 am |
|
 |
Dalamar
Dragon Lord
Joined: Sat Sep 21, 2002 6:42 pm Posts: 9671 Location: Designing new breeds of Dragons
|
If you replace "result" with "top face" you have a completely different rule
The rule for both models talks about "result" and Kairos can change any "result" to any other "result". There are no restrictions in place.
_________________ 7th edition army book: Games Played: 213 Games Won: 114 (54%) Games Drawn: 33 (15%) Games Lost: 66 (31%)
8th Edition army book W/D/L: Druchii: 36/4/16
|
Fri Jul 17, 2015 4:04 am |
|
 |
Red...
Generalissimo
Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 3:09 pm Posts: 3704 Location: Baltimore
|
The pertinent language may come in the main rules set: "Warhammer: Age of Sigmar uses six-sided dice (sometimes abbreviated to D6)." p1 main rules.
How can you change the result of a D6 to any number other than 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, or 6? Basic logic applies: if I flip a coin, the potential exists for three results: heads, tails, or lands on its side. If I change the result, I can only select from one of those three outcomes - I can't say change the result to, say, "cereal" because that's not an option.
Don't get me wrong, AoS is utter garbage as a game and a mockery of the Fantasy player base by GW, and I emphasize with the urge to rightly ridicule and demean the stupid special rules in the warscrolls for existing model ranges, but in this case it doesn't quite apply. The rules do clearly state that the game uses D6 and there are only six possible results on a D6. Thus, you cannot choose 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, or 12 for the dice that Kairos changes, which is what the instant win formula would need, because those are not possible results.
_________________"While all answers are replies, not all replies are answers. So answer the question." Don't be a munchkin? I am an Extraordinary Druchii Gentleman
|
Fri Jul 17, 2015 5:11 am |
|
 |
Dalamar
Dragon Lord
Joined: Sat Sep 21, 2002 6:42 pm Posts: 9671 Location: Designing new breeds of Dragons
|
But you don't change a result of a d6. you change a result on the screaming bell table.
_________________ 7th edition army book: Games Played: 213 Games Won: 114 (54%) Games Drawn: 33 (15%) Games Lost: 66 (31%)
8th Edition army book W/D/L: Druchii: 36/4/16
|
Fri Jul 17, 2015 4:29 pm |
|
 |
direweasel
Malekith's Personal Guard
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 9:58 pm Posts: 920 Location: Terre Haute, IN, USA
|
Simple answer there - the jackwad who brings that "army" gets shamed, and you never play them again.
_________________Chinese Relativity Axiom: No matter how glorious your triumphs, nor how miserable your failures, there will always be at least one billion people in China who don't give a damn. Apocalypse Drow! Plog: http://druchii.net/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=75360
|
Fri Jul 17, 2015 4:39 pm |
|
 |
Red...
Generalissimo
Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 3:09 pm Posts: 3704 Location: Baltimore
|
Hmmm, yes, I guess it could be read either way.
_________________"While all answers are replies, not all replies are answers. So answer the question." Don't be a munchkin? I am an Extraordinary Druchii Gentleman
|
Fri Jul 17, 2015 5:29 pm |
|
 |
Arquinsiel
Shadowdancer
Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 1:16 pm Posts: 4987 Location: The deepest pits in a hell of my own making
|
As I said elsewhere, that this conversation is even possible demonstrates the failure of design that happened here. This wasn't some "oh a new ruleset had unintended consequences with an old book", this was all done at the same time.
|
Fri Jul 17, 2015 5:37 pm |
|
 |
direweasel
Malekith's Personal Guard
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 9:58 pm Posts: 920 Location: Terre Haute, IN, USA
|
Every game system has loopholes and exploits. Granted, some have more than others, and some are more egregious and inexplicable than others. AoS seems to fall in that category.
Nonetheless, games with the level of complexity required to be interesting, challenging, and fun are going to have that. No offense to those of you who enjoy "Candy Land", but such is generally the case. It's just a fact. The best designed RPG or wargame ever is still going to have ways where sufficiently motivated people can find and abuse rules exploits.
Good rules-creation is important, but it's also equally (if not more) important to choose your opponents carefully. Life is too short, and leisure time too limited, to spend gaming with douchebags.
Yes I understand that this is not generally possible in competitive tournament situations. In cases like that you should prepare yourself to tolerate more underhandedness than you ordinarily would, and respond accordingly. I will also point out that different game systems attract different kinds of gamers. I play in an Axis and Allies tourney every year at GenCon, with total strangers, and haven't run into a bad opponent yet in terms of sportsmanship and respectful behavior. I can't say the same for Warhammer Fantasy events, despite the fact that many of them have dedicated "Sportsmanship awards", while A&A events generally do not. (And that is before the advent of Age of Sigmar, obviously)
_________________Chinese Relativity Axiom: No matter how glorious your triumphs, nor how miserable your failures, there will always be at least one billion people in China who don't give a damn. Apocalypse Drow! Plog: http://druchii.net/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=75360
|
Fri Jul 17, 2015 6:34 pm |
|
 |
Arquinsiel
Shadowdancer
Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 1:16 pm Posts: 4987 Location: The deepest pits in a hell of my own making
|
Most games manage to avoid day 0 auto-win conditions however.
For all you disparage Candy Land and games of it's ilk, Age of Sigmar is definitely at that end of the wargames complexity spectrum. Even games designed specifically to be simple like DBA or Memoir '44 have more robustness to them.
|
Fri Jul 17, 2015 6:42 pm |
|
 |
Daeron
Malekith's Best Friend
Joined: Fri Oct 03, 2003 7:36 pm Posts: 3851 Location: Belgium, Brussels
|
Have you played the starter box, Arq?
_________________I love me a bowl of numbers to crunch for breakfast. If you need anything theoryhammered, I gladly take requests. Furnace of Arcana, a warhammer blog with delusional grandeur. "I move unseen. I hide in light and shadow. I move faster than a bird. No plate of armour ever stopped me. I strike recruits and veterans with equal ease. And all shiver at my coldest of whispers." - The stiff breeze
|
Fri Jul 17, 2015 6:56 pm |
|
 |
Arquinsiel
Shadowdancer
Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 1:16 pm Posts: 4987 Location: The deepest pits in a hell of my own making
|
I would, if I could find anyone who owns it... the FLGS hasn't even bothered to open one for demo games.
|
Fri Jul 17, 2015 7:52 pm |
|
 |
Daeron
Malekith's Best Friend
Joined: Fri Oct 03, 2003 7:36 pm Posts: 3851 Location: Belgium, Brussels
|
If you live in Belgium, you're welcome to join me for a game 
_________________I love me a bowl of numbers to crunch for breakfast. If you need anything theoryhammered, I gladly take requests. Furnace of Arcana, a warhammer blog with delusional grandeur. "I move unseen. I hide in light and shadow. I move faster than a bird. No plate of armour ever stopped me. I strike recruits and veterans with equal ease. And all shiver at my coldest of whispers." - The stiff breeze
|
Fri Jul 17, 2015 8:12 pm |
|
 |
Arquinsiel
Shadowdancer
Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 1:16 pm Posts: 4987 Location: The deepest pits in a hell of my own making
|
I'd take you up on that, but I'm in Ireland. I can see it working okay as a standalone boxed game on the assumption that it's all there ever will be, but it'd be like Heroquest to D&D and just leave you houserulling more additions. I am marginally tempted by the Assassin board game that's out, however.
|
Fri Jul 17, 2015 8:25 pm |
|
|
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 14 posts ] |
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|
 |
|